|In June, 2010, in a previous blog I quoted Justin Kruger and David Dunning,|
|When people are incompetent in the strategies they adopt to achieve success and satisfaction, they suffer a dual burden: not only do they reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the ability to realize it.Unfortunately nothing has changed.
The heart and core of the Department of Education is a school closing policy. The Office of Portfolio Development determines which schools to close based on performance and geography. Washington Irving is being closed because many new school developers would rather start schools in Manhattan than East New York or South Jamaica or the South Bronx.
The Department should be asking: Why are schools stumbling?
If we overlap schools by performance with a map of poverty by zip, guess what, schools in high poverty neighborhoods are struggling academically, and, not surprisingly, the Department is closing schools in poor neighborhoods of color.
The Department should have learned from the lessons of the Chancellor’s District, some schools require targeted external support and guidance. Instead the Department blindly follows a “let a thousand flowers bloom,” the principal as CEO, no matter how ill-suited, no matter how inept, principals are abandoned. The message is clear – do what you have to do: a “don’t ask, don’t tell” message from Tweed- as long as you stay off the pages of the media – improve scores. Period.
If you bother to talk with principals in Brownsville or East New York schools they will tell you it is difficult to attract and retain teachers.
How do you answer a teacher who asks: Is this neighborhood safe?
A principal announced that as of November 1 no teacher could remain in the building after 5 PM and as of December 1 no teacher could remain in the building after 4:30 PM.
The new, young teachers were outraged – they wanted to continue to tutor and work with kids and they accused the principal of caving in to the UFT.
The principal called a meeting: “You’re all totally dedicated, caring and white – when it’s dark you become prey. In this community male unemployment is probably 50% or higher. Gangs control the streets; those popping sounds are not firecrackers. I’m selfish – I need you. I don’t want to visit you in a hospital. I don’t want to attend your funeral”
The Department allows any teacher to transfer to any other school. The result is that schools in “undesirable” neighborhoods have troubling attracting and retaining staff.
In Bayside or Midtown Manhattan or Brooklyn Heights teachers stay and prosper – in high poverty, high crime neighborhoods teachers learn their craft and move on.
Yes, there are schools with staffs, school leaders and teachers who have the ability to innovate and create and succeed. For two all too brief years the Department supported an Autonomous Zone (25 schools in Year One and 50 in Year Two). Schools worked together, a collaborative network in which schools, school leaders and teachers had the space to create.
The Department loved the idea – and created Empowerment – with a ukase all schools were granted the authority to operate on a quasi independent status. Sixty networks support, but do not supervise schools. Principals can work closely with a network leader or do as they please – all that counts is the Progress Grade, and, we suspect, that scores may be inflated by “help.”
Credit recovery schemes are endemic – inflating graduation rates probably by significant numbers. Fred Smith’s article in the NY Post points to odd abnormalities on the grade 3-8 State tests.
The Mayor is in his own world, oblivious to the real world. The next election is two years off. Who will stand up for the kids and families?
The Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch and other Regents have been made some critical statements in regard to Department of Education policies – maybe, just maybe, the Regents will assert their authority and deny the school closing strategy and force the Department to confront the realities that school leaders and teachers face each and every day.
- The New York State School Budget: Why Are the Wealthiest Districts Getting Richer and the Poorest District Getting Poorer?
- Why are the Specialized High School Segregated and Why Are the Chancellor and the Mayor Afraid to Craft an Alternative Plan?
- Are Schools a Pipeline to Prison? Will Reducing Suspensions Improve Student Outcomes? Or, Have an Adverse Impact on Student Discipline/Student Achievement? What is the Purpose of Student Suspensions?
- Dear Chancellor Carranza, A Welcome and Suggestions for our Latest New York City School Leader
- Jilted!! Why did Alberto Leave DeBlasio at the Alter? And, Who Is Next in Line?
- Janus v AFSCME: How Conservatives Are Using the Supreme Court to Impose Their Political/Philosophical Beliefs on the Nation
- The Alliance for Quality Education (AQE) Should Not Be Publicly Battling the United Federation of Teachers (UFT): The Future of Public Education is at Serious Risk
- What Type of Chancellor Do We Need in New York City: An “Innovator” or a “Collaborator”?
- The Absence of Paid Maternity and Family Leave for Teachers is a Disgrace
- The Anticipated Next Chancellor: What Should Be the Priorities for the Next Chancellor? Sweeping Changes? Continuing Farina Policies? Or, Using Education to Plot a Path to the White House?