“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.” Plato
This weekend the delegates to the Working Families Party convention will be gathering near Albany to select a candidate for Governor of New York State.
The NY Daily News reported,
The Working Families Party is eying education activist Diane Ravitch as its gubernatorial candidate should the liberal minor party decide to withhold its backing of Gov. Cuomo, a source told the Daily News Wednesday morning. The party has spoken to Ravitch, 75, about possibly being its nominee and she has expressed interest, the source said. “Either way, she’ll have a role at Saturday’s (WFP) convention,” the source said.
Within a few days Diane, on her blog, clarified,
In the past two days, there has been speculation in the media that I might be a candidate for governor on behalf of the Working Families Party.
I have not sought this designation nor am I running for any political office. There are many well-qualified candidates, and I expect that WFP will choose one of them.
Regular readers of this blog know that I had major surgery on May 9 to replace a knee that I injured when I fell in April. For the balance of this summer, I look forward to walking, not running!
We are sadden, and fully understand.
The Working Families Party is a spin off from the left wing of the Democratic Party that has become a major player primarily in local politics, with the strong backing of labor, especially local 1199 (hospital and health care workers union), they have swayed policy as candidates seek their endorsement.
In New York State, to remain on the statewide ballot parties must draw 50,000 votes in the November election. The WFP has a dilemma: endorsing the incumbent governor would usually assure the WFP of reaching the threshold to keep their spot on the ballot and in the negotiations they could extract this or that promise to support this or that policy; however, their members abhor the governor.
The polling data must be disturbing to the Cuomo insiders,
A poll of state voters conducted this month by Quinnipiac University found Mr. Cuomo with the support of 57 percent of voters, compared with 28 percent who backed his Republican challenger, Rob Astorino, the Westchester County executive.
But in a hypothetical matchup with an unnamed Working Families Party candidate, Mr. Cuomo’s share of the vote shrank to 37 percent, compared with 24 percent for Mr. Astorino and 22 percent for the unnamed candidate.
Diane Ravitch on the ballot would assure the WFP of 50,000; in fact, she might have out polled the Republican candidate!!
The next in line is a law professor from Fordham, a scholar with no political experience or name recognition.
You can bet that as you read this blog the Cuomo power brokers, the WFP and their labor supporters are huddling. The two hundred or so WFP delegates are suddenly in the spotlight. To say that the Cuomo team is “arm-twisting” the WFP team is too polite a term – they are probably twisting other parts of the WFP anatomy.
Parents and teachers across the state are hopping board the “Anybody but Cuomo” bandwagon, and, for good reason.
* the 2% property tax cap has pushed hundreds of school districts to the edge of “educational bankruptcy,” the districts can no longer provide the basic services required by law.
* the Gap Elimination Adjustment (see excellent description here) is an enormous reduction in education funding that has yet to be restored – when the governor touts the increase in the current state budget he fails to acknowledge that the funding is still well below 09-10 levels.
* the Common Core debacle has angered parents from Buffalo to the East End of Long Island. Regents Cashin, Rosa, Phillips and Tilles urged the commissioner to phase in the move to the Common Core, to no avail. At the end of July the standards-setting process used the “teach to swim by pushing over the diving board” approach – and – lo and behold 2/3 of kids failed the test. As the commissioner tried to recoup on his “listening tour” the anger built, and, when under pressure from the legislature and governor the commissioner backed away and the Regents passed a dense document in an attempt to mollify parents – too late.
* the APPR, the principal-teacher evaluation plan is absurdly complicated, and apparently the outcomes have more to do with zip code than anything else, teachers fear the plan and principals find the results useless.
* the governor’s rejection of the de Blasio funding plan for Universal Pre-Kindergarten created a complex state funding formula that satisfies no one.
* the governor’s capitation to charter school dollars outraged public school advocates, parents and teachers, everywhere.
Aside from education the governor has been on the sidelines in the major initiatives of the WFP,
* the Dream Act would enable undocumented students who graduate from NYS high schools to be eligible for TAP (Tuition Assistance Program).
* the 10-point Women’s Equality Agenda legislation is perhaps the major item on the WFP platform, and is languishing in the Senate.
* public financing of elections.
The governor’s reply to criticism is to blame the Republicans in the State Senate, actually the Senate is run by a coalition of the Republicans and the Independent Democratic Caucus, a breakaway faction of Democrats that provide the swing votes to pass legislation. The governor has enormous power and influence and has flexed his muscles when he chose to flex his muscles. The Marriage Equality bill became law when the governor jumped in and garnered enough Republican votes last year.
One wonders about the team advising the governor – clearly one eye on the November gubernatorial election and one eye on positioning the governor in a possible run for the presidency in 2016, or, if a Republican wins in 2016, in 2020.
The goal for Andrew is to win with as large a majority as possible – hopefully north of 60% -a blowout, a landslide, winning in the cities, the suburbs and the rural areas, a victory so large and that it stretches across the political landscape – a victory that shows the nation that Andrew Cuomo’s appeal can become a national appeal, right of center on the economy, on fiscal issues and left of center on social issues.
His team might be right, the WFP might tell Andrew: if Women’s Equality, the Dream Act and further modifying the impact of Common Core become law we can endorse you – and – tomorrow endorse a “stand-in” pending the end of the legislative session.
The Cuomo team is skating on thin ice – the five million bucks hedge funders threw into TV to thrash de Blasio was a clear sign to Cuomo – either back us in Albany or we can do the same to you – and the governor blinked. His strategic blink deprived his opponents of millions of hedge fund dollars and antagonized parents and teachers. Did starving his opponent of charter schools dollars justify losing possible parent and teachers votes?
I have many friends who simply cannot pull the lever for Cuomo, the Republican candidate too far to the right to be an alternative. The Green Party? A WFP non-Cuomo?
Passing some liberal legislation may be enough to win over liberal voters to the Cuomo column, for others he is no longer a possibility.
I am saddened that Diane Ravitch is not running: I wanted to see the debate!!! It would have been so gratifying to watch Diane vivisect the pompous presidential candidate in waiting.
We can dream.
Maybe Diane can debate a Cuomo marionette …
Ed In The Apple 
I will not be voting for Cuomo under any circumstance. His little charter school/hedge fund reunion upstate was the last straw for me. He is completely establishment and has thwarted our mayors attempts to implement the policies people like me elected him for. Good Riddance!
LikeLike
The governor is no Mario. I doubt he’d be where he is today if it weren’t for his father’s popularity.
LikeLike
I wonder why we keep using the word “liberal” when “progressive” would be more appropriate.
The far right—you know: for instance, Rush Limbaugh, the Koch brothers, the Walton family—have spent decades turning liberal into a word to be feared and hated as much as communism. Are there really liberals in America or have some progressives also been brainwashed into thinking that they aren’t what they really are?
When i say progressive, I’m talking about President Teddy Roosevelt’s agendas to protect 99% of the people from the 1%. He even stood up against his own party, who were just as rotten then as they are now. I want hat Teddy fought for and the gains he made for the people are slowly slipping away as the 1% (known as the robber barons back then) comes back into power like they were during the industrial revolution of the 19th century.
LikeLike
Doubly ironic that Klein and King are hawking their perverted cause, common core and corporate ed, directly to business people, like they should have to. They cite no evidence and make no viable arguments, as common core would require, and they fail to see the glaring fallacy of trying to solve deep social problems through corporate-style policy that turns accountability instantly to fraud.
To John “building a plane in midair” King, I dedicate the Tom Petty song,
‘Learning to Fly’:
Well I started out down a dirty road
Started out all alone
And the sun went down as I crossed the hill
And the town lit up, the world got still
[Chorus:]
I’m learning to fly, but I ain’t got wings
Coming down is the hardest thing
Well the good ol’ days may not return
And the rocks might melt and the sea may burn
[Chorus]
Well some say life will beat you down
Break your heart, steal your crown
So I’ve started out for God knows where
I guess I’ll know when I get there
I’m learning to fly, around the clouds
But what goes up must come down
[Chorus]
LikeLike
State Education Commissioner John King said Wednesday he hopes this year will mark an end to controversy over the Common Core.
“We have an opportunity to move away from the political debates that have distracted us for the last year,” King told roughly 50 business people and educators at a breakfast forum at the Warwick Hotel.
May 28, NY Daily News
LikeLike
Home
Opinion
Editorials
May 30, 2014 at 12:26 pm
NYC is school choice blueprint for Detroit
Ingrid Jacques
63 Comments
Zoom
Klein (Courtesy: Detroit Regional Chamber)
If a school isn’t good enough for your child, it shouldn’t be good enough for any child.
That is the driving force behind the school choice movement, says former New York City schools chief Joel Klein. Too many schools, especially those in urban, high-poverty areas, aren’t doing good work. And parents deserve better options.
“We are failing our kids in so many ways,” Klein says.
In Detroit, that failure is clear. Just look at national test scores that consistently place Detroit students behind all other large urban districts in the country.
“It’s heartbreaking,” Klein says of the dismal scores.
Klein, who is now CEO of Amplify, part of News Corp’s education division, spoke Wednesday at the Detroit Chamber’s Mackinac Policy Conference.
His message at the conference centered on the value of integrating more science, technology, engineering and math — STEM subjects — in schools.
But Klein’s eight years of experience running the country’s largest school district also makes him an expert on school choice.
Klein is a firm believer that competition in education is the surest way to improve school performance. It seemed to work in New York City. Under Klein’s leadership, test scores improved and graduation rates increased over 20 points.
As Detroit’s school landscape continues to expand, city and school leaders should pay attention to Klein’s advice.
During his tenure working with former Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Klein opened more than a hundred charter schools in high-poverty areas and closed just as many failing public schools.
The ability to shut down consistently poor-performing schools with greater ease is something that would benefit Detroit. Weeding out the bad schools would ultimately help the families in those neighborhoods and strengthen new schools.
“I think it’s essential,” Klein says.
Currently, more than half the public school students in Detroit are now enrolled in charter schools — which places the city behind only New Orleans for the percentage of students enrolled in charter schools.
Yet simply having more choices doesn’t solve all problems. “There’s nothing magical about charter schools,” Klein says.
He set about reforming New York City’s school system in a few specific ways. Klein says he courted the charter management companies with the best track records. He also opened smaller schools and gave principals additional authority, while making them more accountable for student performance.
From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140530/OPINION01/305300006#ixzz33OtrSWC9
LikeLike
Remove politics from education, urges N.Y. education leader, CEO
By Chris Gautz
Originally Published: May 28, 2014 6:40 PM Modified: May 29, 2014 3:14 PM
Joel Klein
MACKINAC ISLAND — Removing politics from education, and focusing more on science, technology, engineering and math will help to prepare students for a better future.
That was the message from Joel Klein, the former chancellor of the New York City Department of Education and the CEO of Amplify, an education technology company, who said during his remarks Wednesday at the Mackinac Policy Conference that schools across the country are not preparing students properly.
LikeLike